Parties often attempt to resolve disputes through arbitration, as they enjoy a number of potential advantages over court proceedings. Companies often require arbitration with their customers, but prioritize the advantages of the courts in disputes with their competitors:][failed verification] Consumer advocates have fought the company`s practice of forcing consumers to sign arbitration agreements because consumers generally do not know that they have waived their procedural rights and because arbitration decisions regularly favor companies by consumer reports (for: For more information on disputes that are usually through arbitration mediation, see also staff complaints: most disputes are settled in arbitration or litigation proceedings?). In an investigation of 19,000 mandatory arbitration proceedings in California handled in 2003 by arbitrators appointed by the National Arbitration Forum (NAF), the nonprofit watchdog group Public Citizen found that companies won 94 percent of consumer disputes. The Korean Arbitration Act is the most important law governing arbitration in the Republic of Korea. The official body that handles disputes through arbitration is korea`s commercial arbitration body. Korean lawyers and companies increasingly prefer arbitration proceedings.  The number of arbitrations in Korea is increasing year by year.  Like the courts, arbitration tribunals generally have the same authority to collect costs related to the decision of the dispute. In the case of international arbitrations and domestic arbitrations subject to the laws of countries where courts may incur costs against a losing party, the arbitral tribunal shall also determine the portion of the arbitrator`s fees that the losing party shall bear. Virtually all major trading countries in the world are parties to the Convention, while relatively few countries have an extensive network of cross-border enforcement of judgments. In addition, allowances are not limited to damages.
Whereas, in the cross-border context, only monetary decisions of national courts are normally enforceable, it is theoretically possible (albeit in unusual practice) to obtain an enforceable order for certain benefits in arbitration proceedings under the New York Convention. . . .